The Catholic Lawyer

Born Again on Death Row: Retribution, Remorse, and Religion

By: Michael A. Simons

In the early morning hours of May 26, 1980, William Payton committed three brutal and senseless attacks.  He first raped and murdered Pamela Montgomery, stabbing her twelve times with a butcher knife.  He then attacked and attempted to kill Patricia Pensinger and her 10-year-old son Blaine, stabbing them over sixty times. Charged with capital murder, there was little Payton could do to contest his guilt.  But he did argue that he did not deserve to die. Interestingly, Payton did not present the usual evidence in mitigation. Payton focused solely on his conduct after the crime.  Specifically, Payton argued that he should not be executed because while in prison awaiting trial he had found God, had become a committed Christian, and had begun helping other inmates with their spirituality. The prosecutor, on the other hand, argued that Payton’s conduct after the crime—and his religious conversion in particular—was irrelevant to his punishment. The jury sentenced Payton to death. Now, twenty-three years later, this case will go before the Supreme Court where the decision will be made: should the defendant’s death sentence stand? Although the issue before the Court is a technical one, the case of William Payton raises broad questions regarding the death penalty, retribution, and religion. 

After examining these questions and their implications from both utilitarian and retributivist perspectives, the author concludes that evidence of religious conversion after conviction is relevant in capital sentencing. The available empirical evidence suggests that a repentant religious conversion is relevant because juries consider such a conversion to be an important mitigating factor. And whether such a conversion is viewed as an “ethical transformation” or as “atonement,” punishment theory explains why it should be relevant. The central point remains: an authentic religious conversion is legally, practically, and morally relevant to capital sentencing, but only if it begins with repentance and culminates in atonement (or at least expiation).