Journal of Catholic Legal Studies

Why the Bottom Line is Not the Bottom Line: John Paul II’s Concept of Business

By:  John F. Coverdale

Many observers have noted that American corporate law lacks a sound foundation.  The participants in a symposium on the most recent attempt to systematize American corporate law, the American Law Institute’s ambitious Principles of Corporate Governance, criticized the Institute’s efforts from many different perspectives, but agreed that “[t]he Principles lack a clear and coherent theory of the corporation.” Delaware corporate law has been faulted for being “incoherent, [and] lacking an animating principle.”  Professor Mitchell has described the question of “the nature and purpose of the corporation” as “the great unanswered question in corporate law.”

This article proposes that useful principles for answering that question can be found in the writings of John Paul II.  He offers a thick vision of economic activity and business grounded on a philosophical and theological anthropology which avoids the pitfalls of both individualism and collectivism.  That vision of economic activity and business provides a suitable foundation for thinking about the legal issues of the structure of business organizations, the relations between employers and employees, the goals of business, and business governance.

The purpose of this article is not to propose concrete legal reforms, but to introduce readers to John Paul II’s vision of how economic activity and business fit into human life and into the effort to achieve human fulfillment.  This question may seem far removed from day-to-day legal issues about employer-employee relations, the role of community interests in business decision-making, or the powers of directors.  It is, in fact, far removed from them in the sense that careful legal and economic analysis is required to translate a vision of business activity as it relates to human fulfillment into workable legal principles.  On the other hand, an adequate understanding of these great issues is the essential foundation for a satisfactory resolution of the technical issues.  If form follows function, as Louis Sullivan, the father of modern American architecture, taught, we cannot hope to regulate businesses intelligently without an adequate grasp of their purpose and their role in human life.  But our understanding of the purpose of business and its role in our lives must ultimately rest on a view of what it is to be human and to achieve human fulfillment.