St. John's Law Review

Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2003: Saving the "Elephantine Mass"

By: Matthew J. Chase

Asbestos can be blamed for hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries and has the potential to be blamed for hundreds of thousands more deaths and injuries over the next few decades.  Asbestos has forced nearly seventy corporations into bankruptcy, has caused a near crisis in the insurance industry where it has raised questions of industry wide solvency, and has resulted in tens of thousands of lost jobs and millions of lost pension fund dollars.  A single substance has caused all of these tragedies:  asbestos.  Though the use of asbestos largely ended in the mid-1970s, the long latency period of asbestos-related bodily injuries has made this a modern problem.  Nearly 300,000 asbestos personal injury cases are currently before courts throughout the United States, and hundreds of thousands more are expected over the next few decades.  The Supreme Court labeled the asbestos litigation problem an “elephantine mass.”  The massive number of asbestos claims have clogged court dockets, unnecessarily delayed compensation for asbestos victims, and raised the transaction costs of bringing asbestos claims to an enormous level.  Citing these other problems, Congress has responded by attempting to create a national solution to the asbestos problem.

Over the last decade, both houses of Congress have proposed several bills aimed at solving this problem, yet none have been enacted.  In 2003, Senator Orrin Hatch proposed the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2003 (“FAIR Act”) before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.  After a long series of hearings, compromises, and amendments, the bill passed in the Committee and was sent to the full floor of the Senate for further debate and ultimately a final vote.  While most of the contention surrounding the bill concerns the total value of the fund, other provisions require amendment or adoption in order for the FAIR Act to achieve its purpose of a nationwide solution to the asbestos problem.

Part I of this Note will consider the current problems associated with asbestos claims in the state and federal courts and in the insurance industry.  Part II and III analyzes the background of the FAIR Act, the mechanics of the Act, and how it will help the current asbestos litigation problems.  Part IV discusses ways to improve the asbestos bill to ensure that it will become law and will be a successful and permanent solution to the asbestos litigation problems.