St. John's Law Review

Child Sex Tourism Legislation: Under the PROTECT Act: Does it Really Protect?

By: Amy Fraley

The sexual exploitation of children for economic purposes is among the worst forms of human rights abuses.  In the underworld of child sexual exploitation, sex tourists live out deviant fantasies while claiming to be on an exploration abroad.  As a result of these actions, children are raped, sodomized, abused, and denied their basic rights.  They are not permitted or are not able to attend school or receive basic health care or nutrition, and they are denied the safety and security of a decent childhood.  These children are exposed to sexually transmitted diseases, including the deadly HIV.  Many of these young people lose their lives, but they all lose their childhood.

The goal of this Note is to analyze and critique the provisions of the Prosecuting Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003, (the “PROTECT Act”), which strengthened the existing legislation by making it illegal to engage in child sex tourism, and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s “Operation Predator” program. A further goal will be to compare these efforts to Australian, German, Japanese, and Swedish child sex tourism legislation.

Part I of this Note provides an overview of the problem of child sex tourism and its impact on the child victim.  Part II examines the evolution of United States child sex tourism legislation, focusing on the amendments adopted as part of the PROTECT Act, and Part III discusses the advantages of a comparative perspective by which aspects of the United States approach of combating child sex tourism are measured against their respective counterparts in the Australian, German, Japanese, and Swedish systems.  Part IV of this Note analyzes the lessons learned from the comparisons undertaken in Part III and attempts to establish benchmarks of effective legislation.  Finally, Part V explains that legislation must be coupled with international collaboration and support in order to apprehend and prosecute child sex tourists.  Without such unity of purpose and action among the states, efforts to thwart the problem of child sex tourism will be far less successful than if sure unity were to be achieved.