St. John's Law Review

Solomon's Mines: The Explosion Over On-Campus Military Recruiting and Why the Solomon Amendment Trumps Law School Non-Discrimination Policies

By: Patrick J. Smith

The on-campus interviewing and recruiting season can be one of the most difficult components of the already trying task of preparing to become a lawyer. Adding to the tension inherent in this process is a recent controversy between legal recruiters for the armed services and law schools that feel the military, as an employer, violates the non-discrimination policies adopted by the Association of American Law School (AALS).

It is in the recruiting context that the U.S. military and the AALS, as well as some of its member institutions, have run squarely into one another. Because the military continues to operate with the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy regarding service by homosexual military personnel, the AALS considers the military, in its capacity as a potential employer, to be in contravention of the Association’s non-discrimination directive.  After the adoption of sexual orientation as a protected category, law schools were required to ban military recruiting on-campus. That is, until Congress answered back with passage of the Solomon Amendment. Though it has taken on different forms, the Solomon Amendment requires colleges and universities, including the law schools within them, to permit military recruiting on-campus as a condition of receiving certain kinds of federal funding. Rather than force member institutions to risk losing their own funding or jeopardize the funding of their parent university, the AALS has permitted law schools to allow JAG recruiting, even though such is still considered a violation of the non-discrimination policy.

Part I of this note will discuss the history and directives of the Solomon Amendment.  Part II will briefly outline the U.S. military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy regarding homosexuals in the armed forces. Part III will explore the claims raised by the plaintiffs in cases challenging the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment. Finally, Part IV will explain why, for better or worse, the concerns of those who oppose the Solomon Amendment must yield to the powers of Congress.