Philosophy Professor Explores Law and Moral Responsibility through Film Series

February 19, 2009

Philosophy Professor Douglas B. Rasmussen, Ph.D., is passionate about questions—it’s in his blood. His passion spills over into all he does, whether it’s traveling overseas to lecture on philosophical topics, serving on the board of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (ACPA) or teaching 18-year olds how to be radicals—that is, in his words, how to be a philosopher.

Dr. Rasmussen, a philosophy professor in St. John’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and about a dozen St. John’s University undergraduates recently convened in the Honors Commons of the St. Augustine Library to watch Judgment at Nuremberg, the first film of four in a series titled, “Law, Liberty and Moral Responsibility.” The series, which is running from February 2-March 23, will examine the fundamental relationship between ethics and the legal code of a society. The remaining films—Breaker Morant, A Man for All Seasons and Billy Budd—will delve into the connection between the ethical, political and legal order and question how people can manage conflicts amongst themselves. On the final evening, snippets from each film will be shown to make comparisons.

Four years ago, Dr. Rasmussen, tired of making references to films his students had never seen, designed a series of films to help them link classroom philosophical theories to reality. This semester’s film series is inspired by his coauthored book, Norms of Liberty: A Perfectionist Basis for Non-Perfectionist Politics (Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005), which asks the question: What is nature of the connection, if any, between the ethical and the political/legal orders? In 2008, that book became the subject of another, Reading Rasmussen and Den Uyl: Critical Essays on Norms of Liberty, edited by Aeon Skoble.

“The viewpoint that motivates the film series—and everything that I do—is the notion that philosophy is profoundly practical and is ultimately concerned with understanding things,” says Dr. Rasmussen.  “An individual trying to live without concepts and ethical principles is like someone trying to travel without a destination or into an unknown area without a map or compass.”

An admirer of Thomas Aquinas’s theory of natural law, Dr. Rasmussen teaches his students that being a philosopher requires trying to understand the world in which they live. As an educator, he believes there are many ways to convey the message of philosophy—not only through films but also books, jokes, experience, and honest, thought-provoking conversation.

“I devised an approach to allow students to talk about basic issues and especially to reflect on the connection between law, ethics, and politics, which often has them bouncing back and forth between ideas.”

As a young person in the 60’s, he questioned the Vietnam War, the role of government, and the legitimacy of the draft, and knew at 18 that his path was to be a philosopher. Inspired by the works of John Locke, Aristotle and Socrates, he has spent his life developing his philosophical views. His favorite statement comes from Thomas Aquinas: “Philosophy is not about what men have thought, but how the truth of things stands.”

“I do all of this because I want there to be a greater appreciation for the importance of philosophy,” he adds. “I also do this for the reward; the students really do learn, but it’s a two-way street and they often educate me.”

In a department that has more than100 student majors and with colleagues that are also engaged in research and publication, Dr. Rasmussen is proud to be part of a team that meets the needs of St. John’s students. He teaches Honors Ethics as well as a Philosophy Seminar.  His message for prospective students:  “You must have a passion if you want to learn. You need to ask yourself: “What do I love?"

Jesuit tradition of Philosophy
Although not a Roman Catholic, the St. John’s professor attended graduate school at a Catholic university. Concerned with the basic questions about life and one’s purpose, he found that the Roman Catholic intellectual tradition sought to address these questions head on. The connection between philosophy and this tradition is what attracted him to St. John’s and led to his 28-year career, in which he continues to challenge the minds of all those who enter his classroom and learn something new in the process.

“Such questions as ‘Who am I?’ ‘What am I?’ and ‘What is my life for?’ are questions that every human being needs to address,” he says. “The Catholic intellectual tradition says these questions are important and doesn’t run away from them.”

Researching Perfection
Throughout his active career, Dr. Rasmussen has received funding from various foundations (including the National Endowment to the Humanities and the Earhart Foundation) and his research in epistemology, ontology, ethics and political philosophy has been widely published.  In 2008, he was a visiting research scholar at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center at Bowling Green State University in Ohio where he was involved in researching the underpinnings of the ethical view known as “Perfectionism.”  This concept suggests that the goal of one’s life is self-perfection and individuals need to take charge of their lives, discover their potentials and act to achieve them.

Dr. Rasmussen calls philosophers radicals: “To think philosophically is to get at the root of things.” When asked what he loves about philosophy, he replies: “The constant striving for truth. As Aquinas once wrote, ‘we have a natural appetite for knowledge.’”

A Student’s Understanding
After screening Judgment at Nuremberg, students engaged in probing discussions of law and morality as well as the underlying themes of truth, justice and the ultimate value of the individual human being.

“This was a court case of rules and logic vs. moral reason, which was illustrated when the judge told the German lawyer in the end, ‘You argued this case with strong logic; however, that doesn't make it right,’ said student David Hall in summing up his opinion of Judgment at Nuremberg. “The film presented many questions geared towards law and morality, some of which made me think about my own position on the issue.”

For additional information on the remaining films visit: http://www.stjohns.edu/events.